- The FTT held that HMRC’s assessment denying input VAT credit under the Kittel principle was made within the statutory time limit.
- It was not unreasonable or perverse for HMRC to delay the assessment until sufficient evidence was gathered.
- Penalties under VATA 1994, s. 69C and s. 69D were also considered, with HMRC seeking to collect from the company officer.
- The FTT accepted that key evidence establishing Jeneruhl’s knowledge or awareness of fraud was only obtained within the year before the assessment.
- The Appellants’ argument that the deadline was missed was rejected; the FTT found HMRC’s actions reasonable and within the law.
Source: claritaxnews.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Supreme Court Rules Input VAT on Share Sale Professional Fees Irrecoverable for Holding Companies
- Isle of Man to Raise Plastic Packaging Tax Rate from April 2026
- Supreme Court Upholds VAT Restrictions on Share Sale Costs in Hotel La Tour Case
- UK VAT Gap Rises to £11.9bn in 2024/25, Up from £8.9bn Last Year
- Change in the VAT treatment of supplies of locum medical practitioners














