- The CJEU ruled that tax courts can independently assess the right to deduct VAT, using evidence from dismissed criminal cases against third parties, as long as the rights of the defense are maintained.
- In the case of Fashion TV RO SRL, the Romanian tax authorities denied VAT deduction based on claims of fictitious transactions linked to inactive suppliers, despite the dismissal of criminal charges against the company’s director and accountant due to insufficient evidence.
- The court clarified that the ne bis in idem principle does not apply here, as it involves different legal entities, and reaffirmed that national courts must verify VAT deduction criteria, allowing for the consideration of evidence from criminal proceedings to establish potential fraud or misuse.
Source BTW Jurisprudentie
See also
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ/CJEU/General Court VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
- Podcasts & briefing documents: VAT concepts explained through ECJ/CJEU cases on Spotify
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Business Leaders Call on EU to Modernize Customs Union and Revive Türkiye Membership Talks
- EU VAT Compliance Gap Hits €128 Billion in 2023, Driven by Six Major Economies
- EU Triangular Transactions: More Than Three Parties Allowed, Rules European Court in 2025 Decision
- INTA Reviews EU Proposal to Extend CBAM to Downstream Goods and Strengthen Anti-Circumvention Measures
- European Commission Evaluates Fiscalis Programme’s Impact on EU Tax Fraud Prevention and Cooperation













