- The ECJ is considering whether businesses can be denied VAT recovery solely because their supplier’s VAT number was revoked or inactive at the time of supply.
- This issue creates uncertainty and financial risk for businesses, especially those seeking cross-border VAT refunds.
- The case (C-465/25, Matin Maier v Romania) could clarify if administrative issues on the supplier’s side should affect the buyer’s right to recover VAT.
- The ECJ has previously ruled that VAT recovery should not be denied for purely formal reasons if the supply is genuine and properly documented.
- The outcome will have significant implications for VAT refund practices across the EU.
Source: vatit.com
Click on the logo to visit the website
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ/CJEU/General Court VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
- Podcasts & briefing documents: VAT concepts explained through ECJ/CJEU cases on Spotify
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Focus on ”Exemption – Financial transactions – Credits and transfer of Credits” (Art. 135(1)(b))
- New Book: ”CJEU – Recent Developments in Value Added Tax 2024”
- EU Court Confirms VAT Simplification Applies to Four-Party Supply Chains Across Member States
- INTRASTAT 2026 Thresholds and Procedures in the European Union: Updated Country Table
- EU VAT Rates 2026: Updated Table and Key Changes for Businesses














