- Integration of SAP and Regulatory Agendas: Organizations often manage SAP S/4HANA project planning and regulatory compliance, such as e-invoicing, as separate initiatives. However, these areas are interconnected, and decisions made for quick compliance can lead to complications later during the S/4HANA implementation, including issues with data models and custom code.
- Risks of Short-Term Solutions: Quick fixes for e-invoicing mandates, such as localized tools or tightly integrated interfaces, can create long-term challenges. As organizations migrate to S/4HANA, these temporary solutions may require significant rework, leading to duplicated efforts and inefficient processes that complicate the transition.
- Strategic Approach for Future Readiness: To ensure sustainable solutions, organizations should adopt an “SAP-first” strategy rather than a “country-first” approach. This includes prioritizing tools that align with S/4HANA data structures and change management practices, maintaining regulatory complexity outside the core SAP environment, and asking critical questions about compatibility and future adaptability during vendor discussions.
Source Ahu Ocak Caglayan
- See also
- Join the Linkedin Group on Global E-Invoicing/E-Reporting/SAF-T Developments, click HERE
- Join the LinkedIn Group on ”VAT in the Digital Age” (VIDA), click HERE
Latest Posts in "World"
- E–invoicing Developments Tracker
- ecosio Webinar – Getting Started with Peppol: What You Need to Know (Dec 4)
- Fonoa – The Complete Guide to AI in Indirect Tax
- Country Profiles on E-Invoicing, E-Reporting, E-Transport, SAF-T Mandates, and ViDA Initiatives
- Book by Darko Pavic: The Fiscalization Compliance Maturity Model
