- The FTT ruled on whether Eurocent (Buckingham) Ltd could recover input VAT on professional fees for purchasing retail units.
- Eurocent claimed input VAT on two invoices: one from BHNV (valid) and one from Colridge (invalid).
- The FTT held that HMRC cannot deny input tax if valid invoices exist; Regulation 29(2) only allows HMRC to accept alternative evidence if invoices are missing or defective.
- The BHNV invoice was valid and input tax was recoverable; the Colridge invoice was invalid and input tax was not recoverable.
- The case highlights the need for businesses to ensure invoices meet legal requirements to claim input tax.
Source: rpclegal.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Morrisons Loses Appeal on Aluminium Foil Origin; HMRC Anti-Dumping Duty Upheld by FTT
- UK to End £135 Customs-Free Parcel Threshold, Aligning with US and EU Import Reforms
- VAT Exemption for Management Trustee Services in Residential Flats: Places for People v HMRC
- UK Ride-Hailing Firms to Charge VAT on Full Fares Starting January 2026
- HMRC Launches Import Control System 2 for Goods Moving from Great Britain to Northern Ireland













