- Fitters were independent contractors, not employees.
- Customers had the freedom to choose any fitter.
- Contracts accurately reflected the commercial arrangement.
- United Carpets only supplied goods, not fitting services.
- Marketing language is less important than the actual substance of the transaction.
Source: deeksvat.co.uk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Introduces VAT Relief on Donated Goods, Boosting Charitable Giving and Reducing Waste
- Cross-Border VAT Compliance for Gibraltar Digital Services: B2B vs B2C Risks and Audit Defences
- HMRC Issues Draft Guidance on Advance Tax Certainty Service for Major UK Investment Projects
- Morrisons Hit with £17m VAT Bill After Losing Rotisserie Chicken Tax Court Battle
- HMRC Warns Agents With Overdue VAT Returns: Risk of Suspension and Penalties
