- The ECJ ruled that VAT exemption for intra-Community supplies cannot be refused solely due to missing or incomplete formal evidence if it is objectively established that the supply actually took place.
- Art. 45a CIR does not provide an exhaustive list of acceptable evidence; other forms of proof may be used if standard documents are missing.
- Tax authorities must consider all evidence submitted by the taxpayer to verify the existence of an intra-Community supply but are not required to collect evidence themselves.
- The decision reinforces that material requirements (actual movement of goods) take precedence over formal documentation requirements.
- In Germany, alternative evidence for intra-Community supplies has already been accepted, and the ruling aligns with existing practice.
Source: kmlz.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- General Court VAT case T-851/25 (Roenes) – Questions – Transfer of a Totality of Assets: Economic Continuity vs. Supplier Intention
- Business Leaders Call on EU to Modernize Customs Union and Revive Türkiye Membership Talks
- EU VAT Compliance Gap Hits €128 Billion in 2023, Driven by Six Major Economies
- EU Triangular Transactions: More Than Three Parties Allowed, Rules European Court in 2025 Decision
- INTA Reviews EU Proposal to Extend CBAM to Downstream Goods and Strengthen Anti-Circumvention Measures













