- The Mauritius Supreme Court ruled against Noodle Express in a key VAT case, denying its input tax claim.
- Noodle Express argued it should receive input VAT credit for leases paid and invoiced through its parent company, Hyper Food.
- The MRA rejected the claim, insisting input VAT is only allowed when invoices are in the claimant’s name.
- The Supreme Court favored a form-over-substance approach, emphasizing that proper invoicing and legal form are required for VAT claims.
- The decision highlights the importance of correct documentation for companies using intercompany arrangements in Mauritius.
Source: vatabout.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Mauritius"
- Mauritius to Impose 15% VAT on Foreign Digital Services from January 2026
- Mauritius Supreme Court Enforces Strict VAT Invoice Rules in Inter-Group Leasing Case
- Supreme Court Upholds VAT Invoice Formalities Over Substance in Noodle Express Case
- Mauritius Issues Guidance on Fair Share Contribution Obligations for Companies from 2025 to 2028
- Mauritius to Impose 15% VAT on Foreign Digital Services from January 2026














