Civil construction of thrift store does not provide a basis for margin scheme
- The District Court of Gelderland ruled that Stichting X, a thrift store, does not actually pay for the goods brought in by contributors, thus disqualifying it from applying the margin scheme for tax purposes.
- The court found that the contributions are effectively donations, as contributors do not have a genuine choice regarding the compensation, contradicting the requirements outlined in the VAT regulations.
- Stichting X’s appeal against the tax inspector’s ruling was deemed unfounded, confirming that the store’s operational practices do not establish a valid purchase price as required by VAT law.
Source Taxlive
- The court assessed whether the inspector rightly rejected the objection and refund request based on the taxpayer’s arguments.
- It is undisputed that the taxpayer qualifies as a reseller and may apply the margin and globalization schemes for VAT calculation.
- The dispute concerns whether there is a purchase price for goods brought in, which can be deducted under the margin scheme.
- The court ruled that there is no purchase price paid by the taxpayer for the goods, so the appeal is unfounded.
- The taxpayer’s argument that their process constitutes a purchase followed by a donation was not accepted by the court.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Zero rate refused at car dealer due to inadequate evidence
- No deduction of input tax for legal expenses of DGA
- Bill to Implement EU VAT in the Digital Age Directive: Single VAT Registration Provisions
- Sale of Building Plots Is a VAT-Taxable Business Activity, Not a Private Transaction, Court Rules
- Registration fees of victims of a lottery compensation for services for consideration














