- The FTT allowed appeals by SK Metals Ltd and Spencer Feldman against HMRC decisions to deny input VAT recovery under the Kittel principle and impose penalties
- The court found that SK Metals neither knew nor ought to have known that its transactions with B Trade Limited were connected with fraudulent VAT evasion
- While some factors suggested risk of fraud including trading with a new entity and inadequate due diligence, these were not sufficient to conclude the company should have known about fraud
- The court determined there were reasonable explanations for the transactions and the company did not ignore obvious inferences from the circumstances
- Therefore the input tax denials were improper, the penalty should not have been charged, and the personal liability notice against Spencer Feldman was invalid
Source: claritaxnews.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- HMRC Policy paper: Budget 2025 document
- Briefing document & Podcast: E-Invoicing & E-Reporting in the United Kingdom: Scope and Implementation Overview
- Mandatory B2B e-invoicing as of April 2029
- UK Budget 2025: HMRC Eases VAT Rules for UK Businesses with EU Branches
- Budget 2025: Government Bans VAT Loophole for Uber, Bolt and Ride-Hailing Apps














