- The SCA dismissed SARS appeal against African Bank regarding the Tax Court’s jurisdiction to hear VAT apportionment method disputes
- African Bank requested SARS approve a specific transaction based VAT apportionment method but SARS issued a substantially different ruling instead
- African Bank objected to the alternative method and appealed to the Tax Court when the objection was disallowed
- SARS argued the Tax Court lacked jurisdiction because approving an alternative method did not constitute a refusal under the VAT Act
- The central issue was whether approving an alternate apportionment method instead of the requested one constitutes a refusal that can be objected to and appealed
Source: sars.gov.za
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "South Africa"
- South Africa Considers Raising VAT Registration Threshold Amid Calls for Reform and Modernisation
- South Africa Proposes 20% National Tax on Online Gambling Revenue
- SARS Enhances VAT Registration Transparency and Communication for Applicants Starting December 2025
- VAT Fraud Syndicate Threatens South Africa’s Economy, Costs Billions in Lost Revenue and Market Share
- SARS Limits E-Commerce Imports Under Customs Code 70707070 to R150,000 Per Year for Individuals














