- The Court of Appeal of Tanzania upheld the TRA’s decision to deny Jacks (Tanzania) Limited’s input VAT claim.
- The judgment emphasized the need for substantial evidence to support VAT claims.
- The case highlighted the broad anti-avoidance powers of the Commissioner General under the Tax Administration Act.
- The dispute involved alleged fictitious purchases and unverified supplier existence.
- The Court addressed procedural fairness and the evidentiary burden on the taxpayer.
Source: dentons.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Tanzania"
- Tanzania Finance Act 2025: VAT, Income Tax, and Excise Duty Amendments
- Strict VAT Compliance Deadlines: Lessons from Illovo Case on Input VAT Claims
- Tanzania Reduces Standard VAT Rate to 16% for B2C Purchases via Banks and E-Payments
- Tanzania Postpones Implementation of 16% VAT Rate for B2C Transactions Until Further Notice
- Tanzania Introduces 16% VAT on B2C Online Payments via Approved Platforms