- Supreme Court ruled in favor of HMRC in Prudential Assurance Company Ltd v HMRC on 11 September 2025
- Case impacts VAT treatment of intra group supplies and VAT grouping rules
- Dispute involved investment management services between Silverfleet Capital Ltd and Prudential Assurance Company Ltd
- Both entities were in the same VAT group when services were performed
- Payments were invoiced and paid after Silverfleet Capital Ltd left the VAT group
- HMRC argued VAT was chargeable based on timing of invoice or payment
- Court of Appeal supported HMRC’s position, stating VAT was due
- Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeal’s ruling
- Businesses may face VAT charges on intra group services due to timing of invoicing or payment
- Ruling affects large corporate and financial institutions with intra group service arrangements
- Raises questions about VAT group protection when corporate structures change
- Impacts financial services sector and businesses using VAT grouping to avoid irrecoverable VAT costs
Source: deeksvat.co.uk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Hotelbeds v HMRC: Businesses Can Reclaim VAT Without Invoices, Court Rules
- VAT Report – What Is a VAT Report?
- Post-Brexit VAT Divergence and why the EU Forgives and the UK Doesn’t?
- Fiscal Solutions – Great News – The United Kingdom is now part of our Fiscal Portal!
- Post-Brexit VAT: Why the EU Accepts Imperfect Export Proof but the UK Demands Perfection