- The Federal Supreme Court ruled that the payments made to the complainant by SDC were subsidies, not part of a supply relationship under the VAT Act. The appellant’s claim of providing services in return for payment was rejected, as the program was initiated and implemented independently by the appellant, with SDC only providing co-financing. The taxpayer’s appeal was dismissed.
Source: bvger.weblaw.ch
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Switzerland"
- VAT Info 09: Input VAT Treatment for Holding Companies
- Switzerland Allows Small Businesses to File VAT Annually; Easy Switch by February 2026
- Switzerland Proposes VAT Law Changes for Bundled Offers, Digital Platforms, and Enhanced Enforcement
- Swiss Federal Council Consults on VAT Changes for Platforms and Bundled Services
- Switzerland Delays VAT Rate Increase to 8.8% Until 2028














