- The Acromet Towercranes case provides some clarity on when a transfer pricing (TP) adjustment is considered a supply for VAT purposes, but it does not offer clear guidance for businesses. The main issues are whether the uncertain nature of TP adjustments breaks the link between payment and supply, and whether TP adjustments are more like profit adjustments rather than payments for a supply. The judgment confirms that if a payment is in return for a service, it falls within the scope of VAT. A TP adjustment is considered a supply if it is governed by a legal relationship with reciprocal obligations and has a direct link to a service received. However, this is difficult to reconcile with previous case law. The decision increases the risk that tax authorities may view TP adjustments as VATable, so businesses should review their agreements and adjustments to mitigate risks.
Source: deloitte.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJ Rules on Customs Valuation for Imports with Provisional Prices: Tauritus Case (C-782/23)
- EDPS Opinion on EPPO and OLAF Access to VAT Data for Combating EU Fraud
- EU Agrees on Temporary €3 Customs Duty for Low-Value E-Commerce Parcels from July 2026
- New InfoCuria case-law database and search tool
- New General Court VAT case – C-903/25 (Grotta Nuova) – No details known yet













