- The phrase “just an accounting entry” was used to downplay transfer pricing adjustments.
- The Acromet case highlights the importance of understanding the substance behind numbers.
- The CJEU’s decision on the case is pending, with implications for VAT and transfer pricing clarity.
- The case involves invoices from Arcomet Belgium to its Romanian subsidiary, challenged by Romanian tax authorities.
- The CJEU was asked to determine if these adjustments are a supply of services under EU VAT law.
- Documentation is crucial for VAT deductions, requiring more than just invoices.
- Transfer pricing adjustments can trigger VAT obligations if they reflect real services.
- Fernando Matesanz warned in 2015 about the VAT implications of transfer pricing adjustments.
Source: rsm.global
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ECJ C-121/24 (Vaniz) – AG Opinion – Joint VAT liability requires existing debtor; no liability post-liquidation
- ECJ/General Court VAT Cases – Pending cases
- ECJ VAT Cases decided in 2025
- ECJ C-726/23 (Arcomet Towercranes) – Judgment – Transfer Pricing Adjustment for intra-group services subject to VAT; documentation required
- Public Consultation on Tobacco taxation – excise duties for manufactured tobacco products
