- The court rules that a previous VAT payment and refund to another taxpayer does not prevent reassessment for the correct taxpayer.
- A man rents out properties with his wife and runs a sole proprietorship as an advisory office.
- There are two VAT numbers: one for his advisory practice and one for the rental activities with his wife.
- It is later found that only the man is the entrepreneur for all activities.
- The combination paid VAT for rental in 2016, which was refunded in 2021.
- The tax inspector issued reassessments to the man as the correct taxpayer.
- The man argues this is double taxation.
- The court states there is no double taxation since the combination received a full refund.
- The court finds no violation of principles of proper administration.
- The man’s right to be heard was not violated as he was sufficiently invited.
- The court agrees with the previous rejection of a revision request due to no new facts.
Source: taxence.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Guide to Netherlands Article 23 VAT Deferment: Benefits, Application, and Compliance for Online Sellers
- No VAT Deduction for Luxury Apartment Purchase: Business Use Not Proven, Court Rules
- Rental of Workroom by Silent Partnership: Entrepreneurship Confirmed, VAT Deduction Denied Due to Private Use
- Court Overturns Tax Office Decision on VAT Deduction for Healthcare Complex Development
- Netherlands Prepares for 2030 VAT Reforms: E-Invoicing, Platform Economy and SME Considerations