- Vendor may appeal a ruling allowing use of an alternative apportionment method not requested by the vendor
- Supreme Court of Appeal decision on July 8, 2025
- Right to appeal under section 32(1)(a)(iv) of the VAT Act
- Case: Commissioner for South African Revenue Service v. African Bank Limited
- Vendors must apply for a ruling to use an alternative method if standard methods are not equitable
- Section 32(1)(a)(iv) allows appeal if SARS refuses a method
- SARS argued approval of an alternative method prevents appeal
- Court rejected SARS’ interpretation, supporting vendor’s right to appeal
Source: kpmg.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "South Africa"
- VAT Treatment of Municipal Supplies to National or Provincial Government in South Africa
- South Africa Proposes VAT Law Amendments to Implement E-Invoicing and Digital Reporting Framework
- Umkhonto Wesizwe Party Protests VAT Increase Ahead of Finance Minister’s Budget Speech in Pretoria
- South Africa’s Move to Mandatory E-Invoicing: Draft Law, Public Consultation, and Future Plans
- Briefing document & Podcast: South Africa’s E-Invoicing and Real-Time Reporting Overhaul