- SARS appealed against a Tax Court judgment dismissing its special plea on jurisdiction regarding African Bank’s appeal.
- The main issue was whether SARS’ decision to impose a different apportionment method was a refusal to approve African Bank’s requested method under the VAT Act.
- The SCA ruled that imposing a different method is effectively a refusal to approve the requested method.
- Such refusals are subject to objection and appeal, and the Tax Court has jurisdiction to hear these matters.
- A restrictive interpretation would deny taxpayers their right to challenge SARS’ decisions.
- The appeal was dismissed with costs.
Source: ensafrica.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "South Africa"
- South Africa Considers Raising VAT Registration Threshold Amid Calls for Reform and Modernisation
- South Africa Proposes 20% National Tax on Online Gambling Revenue
- SARS Enhances VAT Registration Transparency and Communication for Applicants Starting December 2025
- VAT Fraud Syndicate Threatens South Africa’s Economy, Costs Billions in Lost Revenue and Market Share
- SARS Limits E-Commerce Imports Under Customs Code 70707070 to R150,000 Per Year for Individuals














