Briefing document and Podcast C-48/97 (Kuwait Petroleum (GB) Ltd) – Sales Promotion and Consideration

Briefing Document: VAT on Promotional Goods – Analysis of the Kuwait Petroleum Case

Case Reference: Kuwait Petroleum (GB) Ltd v. Commissioners of Customs & Excise (Case C-48/97)

Date of Judgment: 27 April 1999

Core Issue: This case concerned whether Value Added Tax (VAT) was payable on promotional goods (referred to as “redemption goods”) supplied by Kuwait Petroleum (GB) Ltd as part of a sales promotion scheme where customers redeemed vouchers obtained through fuel purchases. The central dispute was whether these goods were supplied “for consideration” (as argued by Kuwait Petroleum) or “otherwise than for a consideration” / “free of charge” (as argued by the Commissioners of Customs & Excise).

Key Legal Provisions Interpreted: The European Court of Justice (ECJ) focused on the interpretation of several articles of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC on the harmonisation of VAT laws:

Article 2, point 1: Defines transactions subject to VAT as “The supply of goods or services effected for consideration within the territory of the country by a taxable person acting as such.” This is the foundational principle for taxability.
Article 5(6): Addresses the “application by a taxable person of goods forming part of his business assets for his private use or that of his staff, or the disposal thereof free of charge or more generally their application for purposes other than those of his business, where the value added tax on the goods in question or the component parts thereof was wholly or partly deductible, shall be treated as supplies made for consideration.” Crucially, it exempts “applications for the giving of samples or the making of gifts of small value for the purposes of the taxable person’s business.”
Article 11A(3)(b): States that the “taxable amount shall not include: price discounts and rebates allowed to the customer and accounted for at the time of the supply.” This provision defines what can be excluded from the VAT calculation.
Article 27: Allows Member States to introduce special measures (derogations) to simplify VAT charging or prevent evasion.

Main Themes and Most Important Ideas/Facts:

Nature of the Sales Promotion Scheme:
- Kuwait Petroleum offered a “Q8 voucher” for every 12 litres of fuel purchased. The fuel price remained the same whether or not the customer took the vouchers.
- Customers could redeem accumulated vouchers for “redemption goods” from a gift catalogue (or occasionally services like theatre tickets).
- Independent retailers participating in the scheme paid Kuwait Petroleum an additional amount per litre of fuel sold during the promotional period.
- Kuwait Petroleum had deducted input VAT on the redemption goods.
Interpretation of “Price Discounts and Rebates” (Article 11A(3)(b)):
- The ECJ clearly distinguished between a partial reduction of a price and a complete provision of goods.
- The Court ruled that “price discounts and rebates allowed to the customer and accounted for at the time of the supply” in Article 11A(3)(b) cannot be applied to reductions covering the whole cost of supplying redemption goods.
- As the “redemption goods were provided for the whole cost (i.e., no money was exchanged at the point of redemption),” this was effectively a 100% reduction, meaning “the goods were transferred ‘free of charge’ rather than as a discount.”
Broad Scope of Article 5(6) – “Disposal Free of Charge” vs. “Supply for Consideration”:
- Purpose: Article 5(6) is designed to “ensure equal treatment as between a taxable person who applies business assets for private purposes and an ordinary consumer who purchases goods of the same type.” Its aim is to prevent businesses from deducting input VAT on goods and then disposing of them without accounting for output VAT, thus ensuring “that final consumption is taxed.”
- “Business Purposes” are not an Exemption: A crucial clarification was that the disposal of goods free of charge, where input VAT was deductible, is treated as a supply for consideration “it being in principle immaterial whether their disposal was for business purposes.” The Court highlighted that the second sentence of Article 5(6), which exempts “samples or gifts of small value for the purposes of the taxable person’s business,” would be meaningless if the first sentence did not cover business-purpose disposals.
- Definition of “Consideration” (VAT Law vs. Contract Law): The national tribunal noted that “consideration for the purposes of English contract law is a different concept from consideration as the value of a taxable supply in VAT law.” The ECJ emphasized that for VAT, goods are supplied “for consideration” only if there is a “legal relationship between the supplier and the purchaser entailing reciprocal performance, the price received by the supplier constituting the value actually given in return for the goods supplied.” This requires a “direct link and reciprocal performance between the supply and the payment.” A mere expectation of increased sales does not constitute “consideration” for the promotional items themselves.
Factors Indicating “Disposal Free of Charge” in Kuwait Petroleum’s Scheme:
- “Gifts” Description: The redemption goods were “described as gifts” in Kuwait Petroleum’s promotion.
- Identical Fuel Price: “the retail price of Q8 fuel, whether or not the purchaser accepted the vouchers, was the same.”
- No Allocation on Invoice: “this was the only price referred to on the invoice relating to the fuel purchase.” This meant Kuwait Petroleum could not “reasonably maintain that… the price paid by the purchasers of fuel in fact contained a component representing the value of the Q8 vouchers or of the redemption goods.”
- Separate Transactions: The ECJ viewed “the sale of the fuel and the exchange of goods for vouchers are two separate transactions.”
ECJ’s Final Ruling:
- The Court ruled that, on a proper construction of Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive, the “application by an oil company of goods which are disposed of to a purchaser of fuel in exchange for vouchers… must, where the goods are not of small value, be treated as a supply for consideration within the meaning of that provision.”
- The question concerning Article 27 (derogations) was not addressed, as the preceding answers rendered it unnecessary.

Implications of the Judgment:

Taxability of Promotional Goods: The judgment clarifies that “promotional goods provided in exchange for vouchers, even if intended to boost sales, are generally subject to VAT if they are not ‘gifts of small value’ and input VAT was deducted.”
Strict Interpretation of “Consideration”: The ruling reinforces that for VAT purposes, “consideration” demands a direct link and clear reciprocal performance, where a specific part of the primary transaction’s price is “directly attributable to those promotional goods.” The mere commercial benefit or expectation of increased sales from a “free gift” scheme does not transform a free disposal into a supply for consideration.
Limits to “Business Purpose” Exemption: The “business purpose” of disposing of goods free of charge does not automatically exempt them from being treated as taxable supplies under Article 5(6), unless they fall under the specific exceptions for “small gifts” or “samples.”
Impact on Sales Promotion Schemes: Businesses operating similar “free gift” or voucher-based promotional schemes must carefully assess whether the “gifts” provided are genuinely of “small value” or whether a portion of the primary product’s price can be clearly and identifiably linked as consideration for the promotional item. If input VAT has been deducted on such items and they are not of small value, output VAT liability will likely arise. Companies may need to adjust their accounting practices and promotional strategies to comply.

Briefing document and Podcast C-48/97 (Kuwait Petroleum (GB) Ltd) – Sales Promotion and Consideration

Advertisements:

Contact:

Support & Info

Sign up for our newsletter