- Transfer pricing adjustments in international business are common but VAT implications remain unclear.
- The EU Court of Justice’s Advocate General issued an opinion on a specific case involving a Belgian parent company and a Romanian subsidiary.
- The case involved services provided by the parent company, with adjustments treated as VAT-taxable remuneration.
- The opinion suggests each transfer pricing adjustment case should be analyzed individually.
- The case involved Arcomet Towercranes, a group dealing with crane rentals, with financial adjustments between the Romanian subsidiary and Belgian parent.
- Romanian tax authorities denied VAT deductions due to lack of evidence of service provision.
- The Advocate General stated that financial flows between related entities do not automatically trigger VAT obligations.
- Each financial flow must be assessed to determine if it constitutes a VAT-taxable transaction based on specific criteria.
Source: mddp.pl
See also
- ECJ C-726/23 (Arcomet Towercranes) – AG Opinion – Transfer Pricing Adjustment for intra-group services subject to VAT; documentation required
- Briefing Document: Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-726/23 (SC Arcomet): VAT, Transfer Pricing and Intra-Group Services
Click on the logo to visit the website
Other newsletters
- The Advocate General’s opinion in case C-726/23 may significantly alter the perception of transfer pricing (TP) adjustments in relation to VAT, potentially leading to VAT arrears for taxpayers, as it suggests that certain financial flows previously deemed outside VAT may now be subject to taxation.
- The case involves SC Arcomet Towercranes SRL and Arcomet Service NV, where transfer pricing rules led to invoices being issued for excess profits and losses. The Advocate General argued that adjustments should be assessed individually, highlighting that services provided by one entity to another within a group could be subject to VAT if they are based on transfer pricing methods.
- If the CJEU confirms this opinion, taxpayers may need to document and prove that services from related entities are used for taxable transactions to maintain their right to deduct VAT, prompting a reevaluation of how related-party transactions are managed and documented.
Source PwC
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ/CJEU/General Court VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
