- The case involves a complaint about a binding advance ruling.
- The issue is whether developed or ready-to-build plots, with or without infrastructure, can be considered a capital asset.
- This determination affects the right to a retroactive tax settlement under specific tax laws.
- The complaint is not upheld.
Source: skatteetaten.no
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Norway"
- Norwegian Tax Authorities Outline Strict Invoice Requirements for Businesses
- Tax Representative in Norway and VAT Registration: A Complete Guide for Czech Companies
- Norwegian Tax Appeals Board Rules VAT Applies to Imported Services in Banking Sector
- Norwegian Tax Agency Clarifies VAT Rules for Developers of Care Service Apartments
- Norwegian Tax Ruling: No VAT Compensation for Developers of Health Service Apartments