- BV X was established on April 7, 2017, with A as the sole shareholder. Following an inspection, a tax assessment of €48,024 and a penalty of €24,012 were imposed, but the court reduced the assessment to €29,020 and dismissed the penalty. The court reasoned that while BV X was correctly identified as the performing entity from its founding date, the initial assessment incorrectly included pre-establishment turnover, and the penalty was unjustified due to a lack of evidence of intent or gross negligence, given the lack of clarity and expertise regarding VAT obligations.
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT levy on data for ‘free’ social media services: The Netherlands is waiting for Europe
- The Netherlands: Comprehensive VAT Country Guide (2026)
- Zero VAT Rate Denied: Inadequate KYC and Buffers Lead to Knowledge of VAT Fraud in Metal Trade
- No VAT Deduction Allowed for Self-Billing in Fraudulent Chain; Burden of Proof Not Met
- When Do Holding and Subsidiary Form a VAT Fiscal Unity? Key Criteria and Consequences Explained
