Stichting X, an aviation safety education provider with CRKBO registration, incorrectly claimed input VAT deductions and reversed VAT reporting. The North Holland Court determined that while X’s educational services were VAT-exempt due to its CRKBO registration, it failed to prove entitlement to deduct input VAT or that reversed VAT was incorrectly reported, thus dismissing its appeal.
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Tax Law Clarifies Data Reporting Rules for Small Business Scheme
- Court Rules No Right to Deduct Input Tax for Shareholder Advice Costs
- Entrepreneur Bound by Settlement Agreement in Tax Reassessment Case on Luxury Watches Sales
- Tax Fraud Lessons: The Perils of Mixing Business and Personal Finances
- Financial Application Disruption at Customs Halts Payments, Urgent Payment Requests Possible