- Vof X had a surf school on the North Sea beach
- X requested a refund of VAT for the second quarter of 2014
- The North Holland Court ruled in favor of X, but the Amsterdam Court of Appeal decided otherwise
- X’s container was not considered a sports facility
- The Supreme Court ruled in favor of X
- X’s services fell within the scope of item b.3 of Table I of the VAT Act
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Short stay rental in hospice entitles you to deduct VAT
- VAT deduction on taxed rental: burden of proof mixed use (studio/house)
- Provision of maternity care staff not VAT exempt, but annulment of misdemeanor penalty
- Court Allows Partial VAT Deduction for New Complex Construction Costs; Appeal Partially Successful
- eInvoicing in The Netherlands