- Court Decision on VAT Deduction: The Zeeland-West-Brabant District Court ruled that X BV is not entitled to deduct input VAT for renovation costs of a health centre due to its exempt rental services.
- Dispute Over Pharmacy Activities: X BV claimed it conducted pharmacy activities allowing VAT deductions, but the court found it did not provide sufficient evidence, noting that pharmacy turnover was attributed to another entity (BV 2).
- Mitigation of Penalties: Although the court upheld the tax inspector’s additional VAT assessments, it mitigated the default penalties for excessive case handling time, reducing them to €4,104 for 2017 and €5,014 for 2018.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
- VAT due to number acquisition not deductible due to participation in fraud
- Dutch Government Responds to Questions on Reduced VAT for Culture Media Sports
