- The ECJ judgment emphasizes the need to consider VAT implications of transfer pricing policies
- An arm’s length price for transactions may not be accepted for VAT purposes, such as TP year-end adjustments using the TNMM method
- Upward TP adjustments by tax authorities can lead to negative VAT outcomes, especially when service cost allocations are questioned
- Businesses should keep detailed documentation that supports both the arm’s length nature of their TP policy and the VAT treatment
- Future ECJ cases will explore VAT on TP year-end adjustments, taxable amount for services from a parent company to subsidiaries, and contractual price adjustments
Source: loyensloeff.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Focus on ”Free Products” (Art. 16)
- Briefing document & Podcast: C-438/13 (BCR Leasing Case) – Relief for Leasing Firms Facing Asset Non-Recovery
- VAT Neutrality and Tax Fraud: Implications of Recent Jurisprudence
- Blog Luc Dhont: How Can Multinationals Comply with VAT on Transfer Pricing Adjustments Post-ECJ Arcomet?
- Analysis of ECJ-cases on VAT for Ancillary Services in German Accommodation Sector
