- The case of Procurement International Ltd (PIL) involved the issue of whether the movement of goods constituted a zero-rated export
- PIL supplied goods to customers who run reward recognition programmes, with a shipper collecting the goods from PIL in the UK and shipping them directly to the reward recipients (RR) overseas
- HMRC argued that there was a standard-rated supply when the goods were physically located in the UK, while PIL contended that the supply of delivered goods was zero-rated when removed to a location outside the UK
- The First-Tier Tribunal (FTT) held that the supplies were a zero-rated supply of exported goods by PIL, as the RPOs took title to the goods at the time of delivery to the RR
- The appeal was allowed, and the assessment was withdrawn based on the interpretation of domestic legislation, specifically The VAT Act 1994, Section 6(2)
Source: marcusward.co
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Supreme Court Clarifies VAT Recovery Rules for Corporate Groups After Hotel La Tour Decision
- Appeal Dismissed: Input VAT Denial and Personal Liability Upheld on Kittel Grounds for One Call Consultants
- Input VAT Denial Upheld: Kittel Assessment and Penalties Made Within Statutory Time Limit
- Boehringer Ruling: Could £2.5bn VAT Reclaims Transform UK Pharma and Healthcare Forever?
- VAT Recovery Possible Without Fully Compliant Invoices if Alternative Evidence Provided, UK Tribunal Rules














