- Minister Satonen’s decision to change the trade register is a good start, but tax issues are not yet resolved
- Companies have been removed from the Tax Administration’s registers, which complicates business operations
- The situation of the removed companies must be resolved quickly through cooperation
- VAT deductions for companies owning real estate should not become a cost due to removal
- Removal from the trade register cannot be in line with the principle of proportionality
- Monetary fines can be used as sanctions
- The situation of the removed companies must be resolved quickly
Source: ek.fi
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Finland"
- AI-Powered Purchase Invoice Automation: Basware AP and Azets Agile Service Model Webinar, May 21, 2026
- Finland Clarifies VAT Rules for Government Grants to Newspaper Delivery Services
- New Decree Clarifies and Eases Reporting for Exporters of Dual-Use Items in Finland
- State Subsidy for Newspaper Delivery Not Included in VAT Base: General Aid, Not Direct Price Support
- Finland Supreme Court Confirms VAT Applies to Public Lending Remuneration for Authors













