- Allahabad High Court found detention of goods unjustified in Vishal Steel Supplier v. State of U.P.
- Unlike VAT Act, there is no provision in CGST Act to disclose transportation route
- Petitioner transporting goods from Muzaffarnagar to Ghaziabad, intercepted at Hapur
- No discrepancies found in documentation, no evidence of intent to evade tax
- No requirement to disclose specific transportation route under GST framework
- Petitioner filed writ petition against detention orders
- Allahabad High Court held that there is no provision in CGST Act to disclose transportation route
- Court quashed detention orders and mandated refund of any amount deposited by Petitioner
Source: a2ztaxcorp.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "India"
- CESTAT Rules Preloaded Software Must Be Included in Customs Valuation of Navigation Devices
- GST Council Eases Compliance: Credit Notes No Longer Tied to Invoices, Benefits FMCG Sector
- India’s GST Overhaul: Key Insights on October 2025 Tax Rate Changes and Implications
- FM Sitharaman Confirms GST Rate Cut Implementation on September 22, 2025
- Government Reduces GST Across Sectors, Prices to Drop from September 22, Boosting Consumer Demand