The District Court of Amsterdam ruled that it had not been sufficiently established that X made an active or passive contribution to cat-catcher constructions, leading to a full acquittal for filing incorrect VAT returns and forgery of documents. X trades in used cars internationally, and criminal investigations have been ongoing against a business relation and two of their contacts. The court found that X’s administration was in good order, and the discrepancies between delivery and business addresses were plausibly explained by the nature of the international car trade.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No VAT Fiscal Unity Without Financial Integration, Rules Advocate General Ettema
- No VAT group according to AG due to lack of financial interconnectedness
- VAT in 2026: mark these deadlines in your calendar
- Supreme Court Upholds Additional VAT Assessment Due to Insufficient Proof Against Revenue Reconstruction
- Tourist Tax Included in VAT Base for Campsite Services, Supreme Court Rules
