- ECJ released a ruling in Case No. C-533/22 regarding Romanian VAT Place of Supply Rules
- Case involved a Romanian entity providing services to a German company in the same corporate group
- Romanian Tax Agency claimed German company had a fixed establishment in Romania for VAT purposes
- ECJ ruled that a fixed establishment cannot be established solely based on corporate relationship
- Services must be distinct and not merely preparatory or auxiliary for a fixed establishment to exist
Source: globalvatcompliance.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Focus on ”Free Products” (Art. 16)
- Briefing document & Podcast: C-438/13 (BCR Leasing Case) – Relief for Leasing Firms Facing Asset Non-Recovery
- VAT Neutrality and Tax Fraud: Implications of Recent Jurisprudence
- Blog Luc Dhont: How Can Multinationals Comply with VAT on Transfer Pricing Adjustments Post-ECJ Arcomet?
- ECJ Opinion Sheds Light on VAT for Ancillary Services in German Accommodation Sector
