- Polish tax authorities claimed a farmer had to pay VAT on compensation for expropriated land
- The farmer disputed this and was supported by the administrative court
- The tax authorities appealed, but once again did not succeed
- The highest administrative court asked the CJEU whether expropriation should be considered a supply of goods by the farmer
- The CJEU ruled that the farmer must pay VAT on the compensation, even if he has not taken any steps to sell the land.
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- VAT and Transfer Pricing: CJEU’s Arcomet Decision Clarifies Intra-Group Service Remuneration and VAT.
- VAT on Transfer Pricing Adjustments: Importance of Detailed Documentation in Court Rulings
- E-Invoicing in the EU: Tax Authorities’ Data Use and Its Impact on Businesses
- Are Pre-Filled VAT Returns Truly Beneficial for Businesses Navigating Complex Tax Regimes?
- EU VAT Expert Group Highlights E-Invoicing Standardisation Challenges and ViDA’s Impact on Businesses
