- Landsskatteretten found that Skattestyrelsen did not provide enough evidence to prove that the original decisions were delivered
- Special circumstances were found to justify extraordinary reopening of the case
- The taxpayer should have reacted earlier to the first period of VAT assessment
- The deadline for reopening was missed for the first period, but was met for the remaining periods
- Lack of specific information about the preliminary assessments and subsequent VAT amounts contributed to the taxpayer’s lack of knowledge
Source: info.skat.dk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Denmark"
- Danish Tax Council Clarifies VAT and Electricity Tax Rules for EV Charging Services
- Denmark Clarifies VAT Deduction Rules for Subcontractor Services in Concert and Event Industry
- Danish Tax Council Clarifies Electricity Tax and VAT for EV Charging Station Operators
- Danish Court Denies VAT Deductions for Concert Company Due to Insufficient Subcontractor Documentation
- Tax and VAT Treatment for Charging Stations: Electricity Tax Refunds, Billing Basis, and VAT Deductions