- ET and her husband WT acquired and sold various plots without paying VAT
- Tax authorities imposed a VAT debt, claiming that the sale of the plots constitutes an economic activity
- The referring judge in Poland is unsure about the interpretation of the term ‘economic activity’ in the VAT Directive
- The judge questions whether it is relevant that the land’s destination was changed at the couple’s initiative
- The judge also wants to know if a group of jointly acting natural persons falls under the term ‘person’ in the VAT Directive
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ECJ/General Court VAT Cases – Pending cases
- New ECJ VAT Case T-680/25 (Mercedes Benz) – No details known yet
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – 3 Judgments, 3 AG Opinions till November 13, 2025
- Trickiest countries in which to achieve compliance
- EU VAT Guide: Disbursements vs Recharges Classification and Tax Implications
