- The requirements for the recipient of services under § 13b (5) sentence 1 of the Value Added Tax Act (UStG) were discussed in the judgment.
- The use of a valid VAT identification number by the recipient is not decisive for the shift of the tax liability under § 13b (5) sentence 1 of the UStG.
- The shift of the tax liability from the supplier to the recipient benefits the supplier and places the burden of proof on the supplier regarding the conditions of § 13b (5) sentence 1, sentence 1, paragraph 1 UStG.
- A decision based on the burden of proof can only be made in financial court proceedings in case the facts are unclear.
Source: datenbank.nwb.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- German MOF Proposes Tax Relief Measures in Draft Tax Amendment Act 2025
- Germany Proposes Permanent VAT Reduction for Restaurant Services in 2025 Tax Amendment Bill
- Webinar MDDP: E-invoicing for SMEs – upcoming changes in Poland, Germany and Belgium (Sept 9)
- Tax-Free Mediation Services for Online Loan and Bank Account Brokerage by Hidden Intermediaries
- Finance Ministry Updates Tax Code Application Decree with New E-Invoicing and Record-Keeping Rules