DGA X was criminally prosecuted for VAT fraud despite default fines BV
BV Y did not file VAT returns, inspector imposed additional tax assessments
X was prosecuted for not filing VAT returns and filing incorrect returns
Den Bosch Court of Appeal declared OM inadmissible, but Supreme Court appealed in cassation
Supreme Court ruled that X was prosecuted as a natural person
Den Bosch Court of Appeal declared X’s appeal unfounded
Court of Appeal found it proven that X had actually been in charge of VAT fraud
Prosecution of X was admissible
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT and School Building Transfers: Economic Activity, Consideration, and Legal Certainty in Dutch Case Law
- New policy note on intermediation in share transactions
- No Excuse for Unpaid VAT Without Filing Invitation; Fine Upheld but Reduced to €1,500
- No VAT Deduction for Exempt Rental by Partnership to BV, Court Den Bosch 2025
- Penalty for payment of additional VAT assessment reduced due to incidental negligence