The Amsterdam Court of Appeal upheld the ruling that X’s permit to act as a limited fiscal representative and the Article 23 permit were rightly revoked. X was transporting goods to EU countries other than the UK for Chinese companies without a permanent establishment in Europe, and listing them on the UK VAT number, which deprived EU authorities of their supervisory functions. The court found this conduct sufficient ground for revocation of the permits, and ruled that the withdrawals did not infringe the principle of proportionality.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Tax Classification of Parking Lot Parcels with Paving: A-G’s Conclusion on VAT Status
- E-invoicing obligation in the Netherlands: where does The Hague really stand?
- AG Dutch Supreme Court: When Does Brick Paving Qualify as Developed Land in Dutch Law?
- Benelux Study Day on E-Invoicing (25 March 2025): Conclusions and Strategic Outlook
- Netherlands Reveals Four-Phase Plan for EU ViDA Implementation by 2030 Deadline
