- Madras High Court allowed the writ petition in the case of Sri Shamunga Hardwares Electricals v. State Tax Officer
- Credit should not be denied when ITC claim is not reflected in GSTR-3B but is claimable based on GSTR-2A and GSTR-9
- Petitioner filed nil return in GSTR-3B but ITC was reflected in GSTR-2A and GSTR-9
- Revenue Department rejected ITC claim based on GSTR-3B, leading to the writ petition
- Court held that Assessing Officer should examine ITC claim based on required documents, not solely on GSTR-3B
- Impugned Orders were quashed and matter remanded back for reconsideration.
Source: a2ztaxcorp.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "India"
- GST 2.0 Boosts Bengal’s Economy with Rate Cuts on Local Goods and Industries
- Finance Minister Addresses GST Transition Concerns, Outlines Measures for Smooth Implementation
- Rajasthan HC Rules Principal-to-Principal Service Contracts as Export, Not Intermediary, Under GST
- CBAM Compliance Guide for Indian Exporters: 2025–26 Edition
- Government Scrutinizes E-commerce for Ignoring CST Rate Cuts, Investigates 3,000 Consumer Complaints