Advocate General Emiliou concludes that no facts or circumstances have come to light that affect the validity of DAC6. There is no reason to believe that the EU legislature infringed the principle of equal treatment by including taxes other than the corporation tax.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ECJ Case: VAT Treatment of Loyalty Points vs Vouchers Under EU Directive
- FISC Hearing on Tax Implications of Trump Administration Policies September 23
- VAT Rules for Virtual Game Currencies: EU Court Advocate General Opinion
- Comments on ECJ C-472/24: AG Opinion on Taxation of Virtual Gold in Online Gaming
- Briefing document & Podcast: ECJ C-564/15 (Farkas) – Non-application Reverse-Charge, 50% tax penalty is disproportionate
