- Municipality X collected different categories of household waste according to its waste ordinance
- Stichting A was established by producers and importers to comply with Extended Producer Responsibility
- Stichting B monitored material flows on behalf of Stichting A
- A framework agreement was made between the government, packaging industry, and municipalities for waste management
- Municipality X had a standardized agreement with Stichting B for waste management
- Municipality X received compensation from Stichting A for waste management activities
- Municipality X did not pay VAT on the compensation received from Stichting A
- In 2019, it was determined that waste management services provided by municipalities were subject to VAT
- Municipality X had to correct VAT deductions made on waste management costs for the years 2015-2019.
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- GP’s Coordinating Services for Foundation Subject to VAT, Not Exempt as Medical Services
- No VAT-Taxed Rental Option for New Studio Home Without Sufficient Taxable Use Proven
- ECHR: VAT Assessments in Italmoda Case Are Not Criminal Penalties Under Article 7 ECHR
- Netherlands Keeps 9% VAT for Culture, Raises Accommodation VAT to 21% from 2026
- Internet consultation on new VAT rules for platform economy starting July 2028
