The Zeeland-West-Brabant District Court ruled that X, a BIG-registered nurse, performed VAT-exempt services and therefore was not entitled to deduct input VAT. The court also found the 10% default penalty of €1649 to be appropriate and necessary. X, who cooperated with the audit, failed to make it plausible that there was an absence of all guilt. The court upheld the penalty despite the audit period being exceeded by one month, citing X’s failure to appear for a scheduled hearing on two occasions without notice.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Tax Classification of Parking Lot Parcels with Paving: A-G’s Conclusion on VAT Status
- E-invoicing obligation in the Netherlands: where does The Hague really stand?
- AG Dutch Supreme Court: When Does Brick Paving Qualify as Developed Land in Dutch Law?
- Benelux Study Day on E-Invoicing (25 March 2025): Conclusions and Strategic Outlook
- Netherlands Reveals Four-Phase Plan for EU ViDA Implementation by 2030 Deadline
