- BV X and its director Y were convicted for VAT fraud and forgery
- The fraud involved the improper shifting of VAT by BV X to its customers with forged invoices
- BV X also committed VAT fraud with credit invoices
- The fraud was reported to the FIOD fraud desk in 2021
- BV X and Y reached an agreement with the prosecutor on a settlement proposal
- The criminal court of Rechtbank Overijssel ruled that BV X must maintain its business administration
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Refund Request Denied Due to Late Submission: Court of Appeal Decision 2025
- Pension Fund’s Insurance Service Exempt from VAT; No Right to Input Tax Deduction
- VAT Assessment Upheld Due to Missing Invoices and Insufficient Proof for Deductions and Loans
- Fiscal Unity for VAT Due to Close Financial and Economic Ties Upheld by Court
- EU Court: Spain Must Grant VAT Exemption for Group-Provided Cleaning Services to Members
