- Aesthetic-Doctor.com Limited (ADCL) has lost a VAT Tribunal case and faces a £1.6 Million VAT bill.
- HMRC usually exempts cosmetic services from VAT if they are part of a healthcare treatment program.
- ADCL failed to meet the criteria for VAT exemption as the services did not qualify as “medical care.”
- ADCL argued that the services had a therapeutic purpose, but the Tribunal did not find sufficient evidence to support this claim.
- The Tribunal concluded that the services provided by ADCL were not considered medical care.
Source: mha.co.uk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Supreme Court Rules VAT Applicable on Success Fees After Exit from VAT Group
- JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v HMRC: VAT Dispute on Intra-group Service Taxability, Appeal Dismissed
- UK Considers VAT Cut on Domestic Fuel: Targeted Relief or Broad Measure?
- Supreme Court Clarifies VAT Grouping and Time of Supply Rules in Prudential Assurance Case
- Guernsey Seeks Companies to Support New GST Administration, Tender Deadline Approaches
