The Zeeland-West-Brabant District Court ruled that X was not entitled to an additional VAT refund because she did not prove that she was providing VAT-taxed services when she rented out the premises to the library, city shop, music school, and community centre. The court also stated that X failed to demonstrate a right to a greater refund than what had already been granted. The inspector had already granted more refund than X was entitled to, so X’s claim was unfounded.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Tax Classification of Parking Lot Parcels with Paving: A-G’s Conclusion on VAT Status
- E-invoicing obligation in the Netherlands: where does The Hague really stand?
- AG Dutch Supreme Court: When Does Brick Paving Qualify as Developed Land in Dutch Law?
- Benelux Study Day on E-Invoicing (25 March 2025): Conclusions and Strategic Outlook
- Netherlands Reveals Four-Phase Plan for EU ViDA Implementation by 2030 Deadline
