- The Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) ruled that a reduction in accounts receivable (AR) did not result in a value added tax (VAT) deficiency.
- The taxpayer argued that the reduction in AR was due to the write-off of uncollectible accounts, which should not be subject to VAT.
- The tax authority claimed that the write-off did not comply with the mandatory requirements for bad debts to be deducted from gross income.
- The CTA stated that tax assessments must be based on facts and not presumption, and the taxpayer provided supporting documents to explain the decrease in AR.
- The court clarified that the requirements for deductibility under Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 05-99 apply to income tax, not VAT.
Source: kpmg.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Philippines"
- Philippines Faces Potential Tariffs as Trump Targets Countries with Digital Taxes
- Philippines Announces VAT Exemption on Medicines to Lower Healthcare Costs and Improve Access
- Philippines President Approves VAT Refund Program to Boost Tourism by 2024
- Philippine Court Clarifies Input VAT Refunds for Zero-Rated Sales in Outsourcing Services Case
- Philippine Court Denies VAT Refund for Singapore Firm Due to Insufficient Documentation