The Court of The Hague ruled that X bv, a developer of computer games, apps, and games, is entitled to reclaim VAT for all months of 2019 after a compromise at the hearing. The inspector granted the refund, but marked the invoices deducted by X bv as false because they were not known to the relevant senders. The sole shareholder of X bv is also the sole shareholder of C bv, which provides personnel. The Court allowed the deduction for the part paid by X bv to C bv via the bank, but X bv has not made it plausible with the documents it submits and explains that it is entitled to a deduction for the input tax still in dispute. The doubts sown by the Inspector about the correctness of the invoices have not been removed by X bv.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Tax Classification of Parking Lot Parcels with Paving: A-G’s Conclusion on VAT Status
- E-invoicing obligation in the Netherlands: where does The Hague really stand?
- AG Dutch Supreme Court: When Does Brick Paving Qualify as Developed Land in Dutch Law?
- Benelux Study Day on E-Invoicing (25 March 2025): Conclusions and Strategic Outlook
- Netherlands Reveals Four-Phase Plan for EU ViDA Implementation by 2030 Deadline
