- BV A was part of a group and its subsidiary BV B was involved in a real estate project.
- BV B purchased two properties and took out a bank mortgage of €4,750,000.
- The municipality changed the zoning plan, preventing the development of the project and reducing the value of the properties.
- BV B stopped making payments on the mortgage.
- Mr. X was already involved in the project due to his role in other companies within the group.
- The bank was willing to continue the credit if certain conditions were met.
- The source of the information is a court ruling from the Zeeland-West-Brabant region.
- The relevant law is article 36a of the Invorderingswet 1990.
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands: Shadow Accounting Triggers Reversed Burden of Proof and VAT Assessments
- Netherlands: FIOD Arrests Man in €240,000 EU VAT Carousel Fraud Probe
- Dutch entrepreneur disputes €33,000 VAT debt in accountant disciplinary case
- Netherlands Urged to Speed Up E-Invoicing to Combat VAT Fraud
- Netherlands: VAT Assessment on Furnished Holiday Rentals and Small Business Scheme Misuse
