- BV A was part of a group and its subsidiary BV B was involved in a real estate project.
- BV B purchased two properties and took out a bank mortgage of €4,750,000.
- The municipality changed the zoning plan, preventing the development of the project and reducing the value of the properties.
- BV B stopped making payments on the mortgage.
- Mr. X was already involved in the project due to his role in other companies within the group.
- The bank was willing to continue the credit if certain conditions were met.
- The source of the information is a court ruling from the Zeeland-West-Brabant region.
- The relevant law is article 36a of the Invorderingswet 1990.
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Response to Follow-up Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation Sector, March 2026
- Fuel Retailers Urge Tax Cuts as Pump Prices Soar, Warn Tanken Becoming Unaffordable
- Brokerage Fees Only Partially Deductible Due to Link with Agricultural Exemption, Court Rules
- Dutch Tax Authority Switching to Rabobank Account Numbers from May 1, 2026: What to Know
- Despite the absence of a tax representative, the application of the zero rate
