The Calcutta High Court has ruled in favour of refunding a penalty in a case involving a 9-hour time gap between the expiration of an e-way bill and the interception of the associated vehicle. The judgment was delivered by a Single bench of Justice Md. Nizamuddin, who noted that there was no evidence of the petitioner’s intent to evade tax.
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- Understanding GST Vouchers: Classification, Tax Implications, and Key Distinctions from Discounts and Services
- IMF Economist Urges India to Adopt Single GST Rate and Direct Revenue Redistribution to Citizens
- BJD Urges Odisha Government to Cut VAT on Petrol, Diesel Amid Global Fuel Crisis Concerns
- Strategic Management of GST Credit Notes: Compliance, Timing, and Tax Implications for Finance Leaders
- Himachal Pradesh Assembly Approves VAT Bill, Permits Up to ₹5 Cess on Petrol, Diesel
