- The Court of Appeal in ‘s-Hertogenbosch has ruled that X cannot use the margin scheme.
- X’s designation on the purchasing statements, “Margin scheme!”, is too brief and open to interpretation.
- Additionally, X has not provided sufficient evidence that the suppliers did not deduct the turnover tax as input tax.
- The inspector has imposed additional assessments for 2016 and 2017.
- The court has determined that the amount of the additional assessments was wrongly reduced in the first instance.
- Both X’s appeal and the inspector’s incidental appeal are justified.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Liability of Dutch Kadaster’s Tactical Management Services for DSO-LV under Economic Activity Criteria
- Court Divided on VAT Abuse: Car Sales to Directors at Below-Market Prices and Tax Implications
- Dutch Supreme Court: Abuse of Law in VAT on Underpriced Car Sale by Holding Company to DGA
- Dutch Supreme Court Rejects VAT Refund Appeal; Lower Court Ruling Upheld Without Further Explanation
- Netherlands Raises VAT on Short-Stay Accommodation to 21% Effective January 2026













